With Hibernate ORM 6, pagination started to be unreliable: When
setting the max results only if the first row was 0 has randomly
affected other threads where first row was greater than 0. The
latter thread sometimes produced query which did *not* account
for the offset (cf. threads `-t1` and `-t2` below, while `-t2`
missed the `offset ? rows` part whic `-t3` has).
This has been fixed by setting the first row offset unconditionally.
Closes: #20202Closes: #16570
```
2023-06-02 10:19:03.855000 TRACE [org.keycloak.models.sessions.infinispan.initializer.SessionInitializerWorker] (blocking-thread-node-2-p8-t1) Running computation for segment 0 with worker 0
2023-06-02 10:19:03.856000 TRACE [org.keycloak.models.sessions.infinispan.initializer.OfflinePersistentUserSessionLoader] (blocking-thread-node-2-p8-t1) Loading sessions for segment=0 lastSessionId=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 first=0
2023-06-02 10:19:03.856000 DEBUG [org.keycloak.models.jpa.PaginationUtils] (blocking-thread-node-2-p8-t1) Set max to 64 in org.hibernate.query.sqm.internal.QuerySqmImpl@2fb60f8b
2023-06-02 10:19:03.856000 DEBUG [org.keycloak.models.jpa.PaginationUtils] (blocking-thread-node-2-p8-t1) After pagination: 0, 64
2023-06-02 10:19:03.857000 TRACE [org.keycloak.models.sessions.infinispan.initializer.SessionInitializerWorker] (blocking-thread-node-2-p8-t2) Running computation for segment 1 with worker 1
2023-06-02 10:19:03.857000 TRACE [org.keycloak.models.sessions.infinispan.initializer.OfflinePersistentUserSessionLoader] (blocking-thread-node-2-p8-t2) Loading sessions for segment=1 lastSessionId=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 first=64
2023-06-02 10:19:03.857000 TRACE [org.keycloak.models.sessions.infinispan.initializer.SessionInitializerWorker] (blocking-thread-node-2-p8-t3) Running computation for segment 2 with worker 2
2023-06-02 10:19:03.857000 DEBUG [org.keycloak.models.jpa.PaginationUtils] (blocking-thread-node-2-p8-t2) Set first to 64 in org.hibernate.query.sqm.internal.QuerySqmImpl@71464e9f
2023-06-02 10:19:03.857000 DEBUG [org.keycloak.models.jpa.PaginationUtils] (blocking-thread-node-2-p8-t2) Set max to 64 in org.hibernate.query.sqm.internal.QuerySqmImpl@71464e9f
2023-06-02 10:19:03.857000 DEBUG [org.keycloak.models.jpa.PaginationUtils] (blocking-thread-node-2-p8-t2) After pagination: 64, 64
2023-06-02 10:19:03.857000 TRACE [org.keycloak.models.sessions.infinispan.initializer.OfflinePersistentUserSessionLoader] (blocking-thread-node-2-p8-t3) Loading sessions for segment=2 lastSessionId=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 first=128
10:19:03,859 DEBUG [org.hibernate.SQL] (blocking-thread-node-2-p8-t1)
select
p1_0.OFFLINE_FLAG,
p1_0.USER_SESSION_ID,
p1_0.CREATED_ON,
p1_0.DATA,
p1_0.LAST_SESSION_REFRESH,
p1_0.REALM_ID,
p1_0.USER_ID
from
OFFLINE_USER_SESSION p1_0,
REALM r1_0
where
r1_0.ID=p1_0.REALM_ID
and p1_0.OFFLINE_FLAG=?
and p1_0.USER_SESSION_ID>?
order by
p1_0.USER_SESSION_ID fetch first ? rows only
10:19:03,859 DEBUG [org.hibernate.SQL] (blocking-thread-node-2-p8-t2)
select
p1_0.OFFLINE_FLAG,
p1_0.USER_SESSION_ID,
p1_0.CREATED_ON,
p1_0.DATA,
p1_0.LAST_SESSION_REFRESH,
p1_0.REALM_ID,
p1_0.USER_ID
from
OFFLINE_USER_SESSION p1_0,
REALM r1_0
where
r1_0.ID=p1_0.REALM_ID
and p1_0.OFFLINE_FLAG=?
and p1_0.USER_SESSION_ID>?
order by
p1_0.USER_SESSION_ID fetch first ? rows only
2023-06-02 10:19:03.860000 TRACE [org.hibernate.orm.jdbc.bind] (blocking-thread-node-2-p8-t1) binding parameter [1] as [VARCHAR] - [1]
2023-06-02 10:19:03.860000 TRACE [org.hibernate.orm.jdbc.bind] (blocking-thread-node-2-p8-t1) binding parameter [2] as [VARCHAR] - [00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000]
2023-06-02 10:19:03.860000 TRACE [org.hibernate.orm.jdbc.bind] (blocking-thread-node-2-p8-t1) binding parameter [3] as [INTEGER] - [64]
10:19:03,860 DEBUG [org.hibernate.SQL] (blocking-thread-node-2-p8-t3)
select
p1_0.OFFLINE_FLAG,
p1_0.USER_SESSION_ID,
p1_0.CREATED_ON,
p1_0.DATA,
p1_0.LAST_SESSION_REFRESH,
p1_0.REALM_ID,
p1_0.USER_ID
from
OFFLINE_USER_SESSION p1_0,
REALM r1_0
where
r1_0.ID=p1_0.REALM_ID
and p1_0.OFFLINE_FLAG=?
and p1_0.USER_SESSION_ID>?
order by
p1_0.USER_SESSION_ID offset ? rows fetch first ? rows only
2023-06-02 10:19:03.861000 TRACE [org.hibernate.orm.jdbc.bind] (blocking-thread-node-2-p8-t3) binding parameter [3] as [INTEGER] - [128]
2023-06-02 10:19:03.861000 TRACE [org.hibernate.orm.jdbc.bind] (blocking-thread-node-2-p8-t3) binding parameter [4] as [INTEGER] - [64]
```
Co-authored-by: mkanis <mkanis@redhat.com>
This doesn't work with Hibernate 6.2.0.Final any more, and it is no longer needed after changing the VARCHAR to TINYINT for the enums
This reverts commit 0d96b8db6b.
It treated the single byte String with its ASCII values, which then didn't find a representation in the enum's values, which lead to a "ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 48" for a value "0" (ASCII 48).
This behavior changed when migrating from Hibernate 5 to Hibernate 6.
Hibernate expects a TinyInt value for all Enums by default, and this annotation overrides it.
* Use a valid SemVer format for the SNAPSHOT version
* Update pom.xml
* Update pom.xml
---------
Co-authored-by: Stian Thorgersen <stianst@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Stian Thorgersen <stian@redhat.com>
This has been recommended as the supported way of transaction handling by the Quarkus team.
Adding handling of exceptions thrown when committing JTA.
Re-adding handling of exceptions when interacting with the entity manager, plus wrapping access to queries to map exceptions during auto-flushing.
Closes#13222
Alexander Schwartz