Fix docs typos

This commit is contained in:
Phil Davis
2022-05-03 11:01:20 +05:45
parent 8560c3bc00
commit 3fd33957ca
14 changed files with 37 additions and 37 deletions
+2 -2
View File
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ In order to modify the mime type config you need to set `STORAGE_APP_REGISTRY_MI
```json
[
{
"mime_type": "applition/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text",
"mime_type": "application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text",
"extension": "odt",
"name": "OpenDocument",
"description": "OpenDocument text document",
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ Fields:
- `description` is a human readable description of the file / mime type
- `icon` URL to an icon which should be used for that mime type
- `default_app` name of the default app which opens this mime type when the user doesn't specify one
- `allow_creation` is wether a user should be able to create new file from that mime type (`true` or `false`)
- `allow_creation` is whether a user should be able to create new file from that mime type (`true` or `false`)
### Listing available apps / mime types
+1 -1
View File
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ In ownCloud 10 you can not only create *public links* but also *private links*.
|-|-|
| https://demo.owncloud.com/apps/files/?dir=/Photos/Vacation&fileid=24 | The normal browser URL |
| https://demo.owncloud.com/apps/files/?fileid=24 | the `dir` is actually not used to find the directory and will be filled when pasting this URL |
| https://demo.owncloud.com/f/24 | *private links* are the shortened version of this and workh in the same way |
| https://demo.owncloud.com/f/24 | *private links* are the shortened version of this and work in the same way |
| https://demo.owncloud.com/s/piLdAAt1m3Bg0Fk | public link |
{{< hint >}}
+1 -1
View File
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ Examples would be every user's personal storage *space*, project storage *spaces
Finally, a logical `storage space id` is not tied to a specific [*spaces provider*]({{< ref "./spacesprovider.md" >}}). If the [*storage driver*]({{< ref "./storagedrivers.md" >}}) supports it, we can import existing files including their `file id`, which makes it possible to move storage *spaces* between [*spaces providers*]({{< ref "./spacesprovider.md" >}}) to implement storage classes, e.g. with or without archival, workflows, on SSDs or HDDs.
## Shares
*To be clarified: we are aware that [*storage spaces*]({{< ref "#storage-spaces" >}}) may be too 'heavywheight' for ad hoc sharing with groups. That being said, there is no technical reason why group shares should not be treated like storage [*spaces*]({{< ref "#storage-spaces" >}}) that users can provision themselves. They would share the quota with the users home or personal storage [*space*]({{< ref "#storage-spaces" >}}) and the share initiator would be the sole owner. Technically, the mechanism of treating a share like a new storage [*space*]({{< ref "#storage-spaces" >}}) would be the same. This obviously also extends to user shares and even file individual shares that would be wrapped in a virtual collection. It would also become possible to share collections of arbitrary files in a single storage space, e.g. the ten best pictures from a large album.*
*To be clarified: we are aware that [*storage spaces*]({{< ref "#storage-spaces" >}}) may be too 'heavyweight' for ad hoc sharing with groups. That being said, there is no technical reason why group shares should not be treated like storage [*spaces*]({{< ref "#storage-spaces" >}}) that users can provision themselves. They would share the quota with the users home or personal storage [*space*]({{< ref "#storage-spaces" >}}) and the share initiator would be the sole owner. Technically, the mechanism of treating a share like a new storage [*space*]({{< ref "#storage-spaces" >}}) would be the same. This obviously also extends to user shares and even file individual shares that would be wrapped in a virtual collection. It would also become possible to share collections of arbitrary files in a single storage space, e.g. the ten best pictures from a large album.*
## Notes
+1 -1
View File
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ Examples would be every user's home storage space, project storage spaces or gro
Finally, a logical `storage space id` is not tied to a specific [*storage provider*]({{< ref "#storage-providers" >}}). If the [*storage driver*]({{< ref "#storage-drivers" >}}) supports it, we can import existing files including their `file id`, which makes it possible to move [*storage spaces*]({{< ref "#storage-spaces" >}}) between [*storage providers*]({{< ref "#storage-providers" >}}) to implement storage classes, e.g. with or without archival, workflows, on SSDs or HDDs.
## Shares
*To be clarified: we are aware that [*storage spaces*]({{< ref "#storage-spaces" >}}) may be too 'heavyweight' for ad hoc sharEsing with groups. That being said, there is no technical reason why group shares should not be treated like [*storage spaces*]({{< ref "#storage-spaces" >}}) that users can provision themselves. They would share the quota with the users home [*storage space*]({{< ref "#storage-spaces" >}}) and the share initiator would be the sole owner. Technically, the mechanism of treating a share like a new [*storage space*]({{< ref "#storage-spaces" >}}) would be the same. This obviously also extends to user shares and even file individual shares that would be wrapped in a virtual collection. It would also become possible to share collections of arbitrary files in a single storage space, e.g. the ten best pictures from a large album.*
*To be clarified: we are aware that [*storage spaces*]({{< ref "#storage-spaces" >}}) may be too 'heavyweight' for ad hoc sharing with groups. That being said, there is no technical reason why group shares should not be treated like [*storage spaces*]({{< ref "#storage-spaces" >}}) that users can provision themselves. They would share the quota with the users home [*storage space*]({{< ref "#storage-spaces" >}}) and the share initiator would be the sole owner. Technically, the mechanism of treating a share like a new [*storage space*]({{< ref "#storage-spaces" >}}) would be the same. This obviously also extends to user shares and even file individual shares that would be wrapped in a virtual collection. It would also become possible to share collections of arbitrary files in a single storage space, e.g. the ten best pictures from a large album.*
## Storage Systems