From 4ecc489efc323f24be89f0ae719d8029b6dad864 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Rose Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 00:26:53 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] correct comments --- dtool/Config.Irix.pp | 6 +++--- dtool/Config.Linux.pp | 8 ++++---- dtool/Config.Win32.pp | 6 +++--- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/dtool/Config.Irix.pp b/dtool/Config.Irix.pp index 749d9e915c..21a2e4e883 100644 --- a/dtool/Config.Irix.pp +++ b/dtool/Config.Irix.pp @@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ // Will the compiler avoid inserting extra bytes in structs between a // base struct and its derived structs? It is safe to define this -// true if you don't know, but if you know that you can get away with -// this you may gain a tiny performance gain by defining this false. -// If you define this false incorrectly, you will get lots of +// false if you don't know, but if you know that you can get away with +// this you may gain a tiny performance gain by defining this true. +// If you define this true incorrectly, you will get lots of // assertion failures on execution. #define SIMPLE_STRUCT_POINTERS diff --git a/dtool/Config.Linux.pp b/dtool/Config.Linux.pp index 2ab857c358..819a002107 100644 --- a/dtool/Config.Linux.pp +++ b/dtool/Config.Linux.pp @@ -22,11 +22,11 @@ // Will the compiler avoid inserting extra bytes in structs between a // base struct and its derived structs? It is safe to define this -// true if you don't know, but if you know that you can get away with -// this you may gain a tiny performance gain by defining this false. -// If you define this false incorrectly, you will get lots of +// false if you don't know, but if you know that you can get away with +// this you may gain a tiny performance gain by defining this true. +// If you define this true incorrectly, you will get lots of // assertion failures on execution. -#define SIMPLE_STRUCT_POINTERS 1 +#define SIMPLE_STRUCT_POINTERS // Do we have a gettimeofday() function? #define HAVE_GETTIMEOFDAY 1 diff --git a/dtool/Config.Win32.pp b/dtool/Config.Win32.pp index b4ea89eeb7..9612e702cd 100644 --- a/dtool/Config.Win32.pp +++ b/dtool/Config.Win32.pp @@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ // Will the compiler avoid inserting extra bytes in structs between a // base struct and its derived structs? It is safe to define this -// true if you don't know, but if you know that you can get away with -// this you may gain a tiny performance gain by defining this false. -// If you define this false incorrectly, you will get lots of +// false if you don't know, but if you know that you can get away with +// this you may gain a tiny performance gain by defining this true. +// If you define this true incorrectly, you will get lots of // assertion failures on execution. #define SIMPLE_STRUCT_POINTERS 1